Legal Opinion

Chad Dockter v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 2017No. S-16-0262PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Justice.

[¶1] Appellant Chad Doekter challenges two of several convictions arising out of a violent incident with his former girlfriend. He claims the evidence presented by the State was insufficient to support his convictions of kidnapping and misdemeanor theft of a cell phone. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶2] 1. Was the evidence sufficient to establish that Appellant unlawfully confined the victim as required by the kidnapping statute, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-201(a) (LexisNexis 2015)?

2. Did the evidence sufficiently establish misdemeanor theft of an Apple iPhone 5?

FACTS

[¶3] Viewing the evidence in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Keene v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Dean v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Steven W. Vaught v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Christopher James Yager v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Richard Carl Bohling v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kite v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Chad Dockter v. Diane Lozano, as an individual and in her official capacity Eric Alden, as an individual and in his official capacity Donald Miller, as an individual and in his official capacity Robin Cooper, as an individual and in her official capacity and the Office of the State Public DefenderWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Hurley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Dockter v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Kebschull v. State ex rel. Department of Workforce Services, Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API