Legal Opinion

Hurley v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 2017No. S-16-0281PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOX, Justice.. [¶1] Kale J. Hurley appeals his conviction for felonious restraint. He contends that the district court abused its discretion when it failed to instruct the jury on the definition of “bodily- injury,” and -that there was insufficient .evidence to. establish that the unlawful restraint exposed the victim to a risk of serious bodily injury. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶2] We rephrase the issues as follows:

*8291. Did the district court abuse its discretion when it refused to instruct the jury on the definition of “bodily injury?”

2. Was there sufficient evidence to establish the elements of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bouwkamp v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Collins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Miranda Rose Mraz v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Wilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Douglas Howard Craft v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schmuck v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Terry Earl Neidlinger, Sr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Kite v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Miguel Rolando Bernal-Molina v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Lewis Alan Dugan v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API