Richard Carl Bohling v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Justice.
[¶1] Appellant Richard Bohling was convicted of four felony counts of obtaining property by false pretenses and one misdemeanor count of official misconduct. On appeal, he claims that in order to have been convicted of obtaining property by false pretenses, the State was required to prove that title to the property in question passed from Albany County to him. He contends that the State failed to prove that it did.
[112] We have examined Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-3-407 (LexisNexis 2015), which establishes the crime of obtaining property by false pretenses. Our interpretation of this…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- The People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Adebowale Oluseyi Adekale A/K/A Ted AdekaleWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Haines v. TerritoryWyoming Supreme Court · 1887
- Miranda Rose Mraz v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Commonwealth v. BarryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mark Daniel Byerly v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Michael Angelo Sena, Jr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Haskell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Mitchell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Chad Dockter v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.