Legal Opinion

Koval v. Washington County Redevelopment Authority

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 23, 2009No. 08-2492PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FUENTES, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Joseph Koval contends that his former employer, the Washington County Redevelopment Authority (“WCRA”), arbitrarily revoked his retirement health plan in violation of Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. The District Court dismissed Koval’s suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, finding that the WCRA plan was subject to ERISA’s exemption for “governmental plans.” 29 U.S.C. § 1003(b)(1). For the reasons set out below, we affirm the judgment of the District Court.

I

Joseph Koval is a former employee…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Natural Gas Utility DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Swiger v. Allegheny Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  3. Gualandi v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. Raymond Crilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority and United Transportation Union, Local 1594Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. Hightower v. Texas Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Milby v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2015
  2. Sanzone v. HealthDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2018
  3. Robinette v. HunseckerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Graham v. Board Of Education Of The City Of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. PUE v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORP.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API