Legal Opinion

Robinette v. Hunsecker

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 29, 2013No. 2444PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHotten, J.

“The alphabet soup world of pension benefits has spawned a dizzying array of acronyms, like ERISA, QDRO, and QPSA, and a complex web of interrelated statutory provisions” that collide at the intersection of federal statutes with State domestic relations law. Hamilton v. Wash. State Plumbing and Pipefitting Indus. Pension Plan, 433 F.3d 1091 (9th Cir.2006). In this case of first impression, we are asked to resolve contentions relating to the entry of a domestic relations order and the existence of an equitable remedy in the form of a *80constructive trust when a party to a divorce fails to obtain…

2Cases cited93 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robinette v. HunseckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API