Legal Opinion

National Bank of Chelsea v. Isham

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 15, 1876PublishedCited by 5 opinions

General Assumpsit. Plea, general issue, and trial by jury, June Term, 1875, Powers, J., presiding. The plaintiff introduced a note in evidence, signed by defendant, aud payable to the order of one Mahan, and indorsed in blank by said Mahan and one Elihu Hyde. It was conceded that there was an entire failure of consideration of the note, and the sole question that was submitted to the jury was, whether the plaintiff was a bona-fide holder of the note or not.

Read the full summary

General Assumpsit. Plea, general issue, and trial by jury, June Term, 1875, Powers, J., presiding. The plaintiff introduced a note in evidence, signed by defendant, aud payable to the order of one Mahan, and indorsed in blank by said Mahan and one Elihu Hyde. It was conceded that there was an entire failure of consideration of the note, and the sole question that was submitted to the jury was, whether the plaintiff was a bona-fide holder of the note or not. The plaintiff introduced^ said Hyde as a witness, who was the president and one of the directors of plaintiff bank at the time the note…

1Opinion of the Court

*593The opinion of the court was delivered by

Royce, J.

The court erred in admitting the answers of the witness Hyde. The questions put to the witness were, “ Did the bank discount and receive this note in the ordinary course of business ?” and “ Did the bank receive it in good faith ?” These were both questions of fact, and to be determined as such. The rule as laid down by Ch. J. Nelson, in Teal v. Barton, 40 Barb., is, that opinions, belief, deductions from facts, and such like, are matters which belong to the jury ; and when examination extends to these, and the judgment, inference, and belief…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clough v. PatrickSupreme Court of Vermont · 1865

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fadden v. McKinneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  2. Federal Oil & Gas Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Mid-Co Petroleum Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Bilby v. Thomas Gin-Compress Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Krieg v. Palmer National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API