Legal Opinion

Hedendahl v. Winkler

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1938No. Civ. 10862PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying probate to the purported will of one Oscar Anderson and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

By the terms of this will the decedent bequeathed all of his property to the appellant Elizabeth Winkler, and named her husband, Frank Winkler, executor thereof. A sister, Clara Hedendahl, was named and bequeathed one dollar. The ease was tried before a jury and special issues were submitted.

The appellants concede that no error was committed in the conduct of the trial, or in instructing the jury. The only claim for a reversal of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Estate of MotzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. In Re Estate of RelphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. In Re Estate of HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Estate of GravesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. MacKechnie v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Estate of WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Kiefer's Ex'r and Ex'x v. DeibelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  4. Estate of WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Matter of Estate of AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API