Titrud v. Achterkirch
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
These are appeals from a district court order establishing a judicial drainage ditch to be located in Wright County and affecting a watershed area in Wright, McLeod, and Meeker Counties.
Appellants Cokato Township and several individuals who object to the ditch project (hereinafter designated as objectors) contend that the statutory requirements for establishing a drainage ditch were not met. They argue that total estimated costs are greater than benefits to be derived from the ditch, that the proposed ditch would not be of public benefit and utility, and that the outlet for the ditch is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Establishment of Judicial Ditch No. 75Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Schultz v. County of ChippewaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Mosloski v. County of MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- In Re Judicial Ditch No. 12Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Black v. Northwestern Nat. Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pratt v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1998
- Pestka v. County of Blue EarthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002