Legal Opinion

Territory ex rel. Sulzer v. Canvassing Board

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided March 20, 1917No. 1593-APublishedCited by 3 opinions

Petition by the Territory of Alaska, on the relation of Charles A. Snlzer, for an alternative writ of mandamus against the Canvassing Board for the Territory of Alaska, consisting of J. F. A. Strong, Charles E. Davidson, and John F. Pugh. On demurrer to answers. Demurrer sustained.

1Opinion of the Court

JENNINGS, District Judge.

This is a proceeding by mandamus to compel the canvassing board, consisting of J. E. A. Strong, Governor, Charles E. Davidson, surveyor general, and John F. Pugh, collector of customs, of the district of Alaska, to reject—i. e., not count—the votes or alleged votes from certain precincts for the office of delegate to Congress from Alaska, and to issue to Charles A. Sulzer a certificate of election to said office.

The petition for the alternative writ alleges that the returns from the precincts of Choggiung, Deering, Nizina, Nushagak, Utica, and Bonnifield were not…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Offield v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Rld. v. Comm'rs of Jefferson Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  4. People ex rel. Fuller v. HilliardIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  5. People Ex Rel. Nichols v. Board of County CanvassersNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sevilla v. ElizaldeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Territory of Alaska v. American Can Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1956
  3. Latting v. CordellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API