Santa Rosa Bank v. Paxton
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This appeal is taken from the judgment, by the defendant Charles E. Paxton, and is presented upon the judgment-roll alone. The appellant has no apparent interest in the case, except as one of the executors of the will of Hannah H. Paxton, deceased. His appeal purports to be taken by him in his individual capacity, but as the respondent makes no objection on the ground of want of interest in the appellant, we have considered the appeal as if it were taken by him as executor.
The complaint states a cause of action to recover judgment upon four promissory notes, executed to the plaintiff by the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lambert v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Burkett v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hallock v. JaudinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Stoddard v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Ward v. ClayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Malmgren v. Southwestern Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Holly Sugar Corp. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Whepley Oil Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Meer v. CeratiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.