Legal Opinion

Holly Sugar Corp. v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1941No. S. F. 16536PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This action was brought to recover from the state an additional corporation franchise tax in the amount of $6,100.58, alleged to have been illegally assessed and collected for the taxable year ending March 31, 1935, and paid by plaintiff under protest. A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend.

The facts giving rise to the present controversy are as follows: Plaintiff, Holly Sugar Corporation, is a New York corporation, having its principal office in Colorado and qualified to do business in California and other states. Its principal business consists of growing…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. New Orleans v. StempelSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. People v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co. v. DoughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Washer v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Del Mar Beach Club Owners Ass'n v. Imperial Contracting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Byrne v. HarveyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API