Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. Moody
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COOK, Justice.
This case presents a question of the appropriate interpretation and application of the Craddock test for granting a new trial after a default judgment. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, 134 Tex. 388, 133 S.W.2d 124 (1939).
Robert L. Moody served a writ of garnishment on Bank One.1 After Bank One failed to file an answer, Moody obtained a default judgment for $82,000, plus $1,000 for attorney’s fees, interest and costs. Bank One then filed a motion for new trial that was overruled by operation of law. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court. 800 S.W.2d 280. We hold that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Cliff v. HugginsTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Ivy v. CarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Strackbein v. PrewittTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Lopez v. LopezTexas Supreme Court · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by176 opinions
- Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Walker v. GutierrezTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Director, State Employees Workers' Compensation Division v. EvansTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re United Services Automobile Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Smith v. Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.