Legal Opinion
United States v. Pierre Bell
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 21, 2007No. 06-2802PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MELLOY, Circuit Judge.
Pierre Bell was charged with possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); possession of a firearm after being convicted of a felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1); and possession of a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Bell moved to suppress statements he made to law enforcement officers, alleging his statements were involuntary. The district court denied Bell’s motion, and the case proceeded to trial. A jury found Bell guilty of all three offenses.
In…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Robert HarperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Geoffrey Richard RughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Victor Sanchez-Garcia, Also Known as Sergio Barraza-Ayon, Also Known as Mauricio Borjas-MadridCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Robert Stanford JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- United States v. CananiaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Piazza v. KellimOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- United States v. Anthony KingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. McPikeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.