Legal Opinion
United States v. Anthony King
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 2, 2018No. 17-1140; 17-1976PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSON, Circuit Judge.
This consolidated appeal arises out of the operation of a "pill mill" conducted under the guise of a legitimate clinic. Anthony Markeith King and Kristen L. Raines were charged in a conspiracy to distribute scheduled controlled substances without an effective prescription in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), (b)(1)(C), (b)(1)(E), and 846. Raines was also charged with two counts of distribution of a scheduled controlled substance without an effective prescription, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and (b)(1)(E).
King pled guilty to the conspiracy…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Darrin Todd HaackCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Fred Lauzon v. Senco Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Watkins v. SowdersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Andrew Dollard v. Gary WhisenandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. SimonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Robert LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Walter EscobarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Cleophus Reed, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.