Legal Opinion
Langness v. Fencil Urethane Systems, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 20, 2003No. 20030004PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Duane Langness appealed from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict dismissing his action against Fencil Urethane Systems, Inc. for negligent application of epoxy primer and exposure to toxic chemicals. We hold the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the proffered testimony of Langness’ expert, Dr. Alan Buck. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I
[¶ 2] In 1997, Langness sold RDO Farms a 70 by 186 foot steel-arched quon-set for use as a potato warehouse near Mandan. Langness assisted RDO Farms in the construction of the building, includ ing an…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Williams County Social Services Board v. FalconNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. University of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Victory Park Apartments, Inc. v. AxelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Forster v. West Dakota Veterinary Clinic, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Carpenter v. RohrerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Saefke v. StenehjemNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Peterson v. SandoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Cache Private Capital Diversified Fund v. Braddock, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.