George F. Hinrichs, Inc. v. Standard Trust & Savings Bank
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action by the Standard Trust & Savings Bank against George F. Hinrichs, Inc. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. The plaintiff in error was defendant below and is hereinafter referred to as defendant. The defendant in error, the plaintiff below, is hereinafter referred to as plaintiff.
Read the full summary
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action by the Standard Trust & Savings Bank against George F. Hinrichs, Inc. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. The plaintiff in error was defendant below and is hereinafter referred to as defendant. The defendant in error, the plaintiff below, is hereinafter referred to as plaintiff. The plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Illinois, and conducts its business at tbe city of Chicago therein. The defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of the…
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). It appears that Grant Bros. & Co. was, in January, 1920, wholesale dealers in butter, eggs and poultry in Chicago, and did its banking business with the Standard Trust & Savings Bank in that city — the plaintiff in this action. Grant Bros, shipped a carload of eggs by rail, consigned to the defendant at New York, taking a straight bill of lading therefor. Thereupon Grant Bros, obtained from the plaintiff a sight draft, payable to its order and drawn on defendant, in the sum of $8,424, to which the bill of lading and invoice was attached. The bill of lading…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Shaw v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Conard v. Atlantic Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Dows v. National Exchange Bank of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- North Pennsylvania Railroad v. Commercial Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- The Bank of Rochester v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- The Isla de PanayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- In Re TaubCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Estherville Produce Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- GAC Commercial Corporation v. WilsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Chesapeake & O. R. Co. v. State Nat. Bank of MaysvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.