Legal Opinion

Faber v. Hanbury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 14, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Leander B. Faber, as receiver, etc., from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on or about the 12th day of September, 1913, granting defendants’ motion to cancel a lis pendens.

1Opinion of the Court

Rich, J.:

On the 8th day of January, 1913, the defendant Meht purchased at foreclosure sale certain real property in the borough of Brooklyn, the fee of which she then owned. The plaintiff was appointed receiver in supplementary proceedings of the defendant Flynn on January 10, 1913, and obtained an order enjoining the referee from completing the sale, which was subsequently reversed on appeal. (Hart v. Abels Gold Realty Co., 157 App. Div. 891.) The defendant Meht assigned her bid and purchase to the defendant Hanbury, her former grantor. The plaintiff, on February 19, 1913, commenced this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mills v. . BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. St. Regis Paper Co. v. Santa Clara Lumber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. Brox v. RikerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. St. Regis Paper Co. v. Santa Clara Lumber Co.New York Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Hart v. Abels Gold Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McGurk v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Hoffman v. New York Railways Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API