Legal Opinion

Brox v. Riker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1900PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, William, B. Riker, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 10th day of September, 1900, denying his motion to vacate and cancel a lis pendens filed in the action.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

The plaintiffs, as judgment creditors, brought this action to set aside the transfer of a certain drug business, and the goods, chattels, properties and effects belonging or appertaining thereto, made by defendant William H. Riker to the defendant William B. Riker as made with intent to hinder, delay and defraud the creditors of the assignor.

It is alleged in the complaint that William B. Riker was the owner in fee simple of certain real estate upon the-westerly side of Sixth avenue in the city of -New York, which was subject to a mortgage, and that William B. Riker, with the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fitzsimons v. DroughtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. 5303 Realty Corp. v. O & Y Equity Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Chateau Rive Corp. v. Riverview Partners, LPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. M. Lindheim & Co. v. Central National Realty & Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  4. Brownlee v. VangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Richards v. ChubaNew York Supreme Court · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API