Legal Opinion

Scrivner v. McClelland

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 9, 1917No. 8474PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Garvin County ; F. B. Swank, Judge. Replevin by E. H. Scrivner against James H. McClelland, consolidated with a separate suit for injunction by McClelland against Scrivner, in which plaintiff Scriv-ner filed a cross-petition. Judgment for defendant, McClelland, on the pleadings, and plaintiff, Scrivner, brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

Originally this was an action in replevin for the recovery of the possession of certain personal property, commenced by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against the defendant in error, defendant below. • Hereafter the parties will be designated, for convenience, “plaintiff”' and “defendant,” respectively, as they appeared in the court below.

After the action in replevin had been filed the defendant herein commenced a separate suit against the plaintiff herein 'wherein he prayed for injunctional reliejf. In his petition in this cause the defendant herein alleges in substance that he and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Border v. CarrabineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Deal v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Walden v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carris v. John R. Thomas & Associates, P.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Berryman v. BonaparteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Scrivner v. McClellandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Inglis v. TrickeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Kennedy v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API