Legal Opinion
Injured Workers' Insurance Fund v. Subsequent Injury Fund
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 22, 2016No. 39/15PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.
The two cases before us arise out of decisions from the Workers’ Compensation Commission (“the Commission”). In both cases, the Commission concluded that under Md. Code (1991, 2008 Repl. Vol., 2015 Cum. Supp.), § 9-806 of the Labor and Employment Article (“LE”), 1 the amount owed to the Subsequent Injury Fund (“the SIF” or “the Fund”) by the employers, the Maryland Transit Administration (“the MTA”) 2 and Baltimore County (“the County”), is 6.5% of the Commission’s award of compensation prior to the deduction of any statutory offset.
In the first case, the employer, the MTA, filed in the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Frank v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Whack v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- State Department of Assessments & Taxation v. the Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Schweitzer v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harford Cnty. v. MitchellCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Zukowski v. Anne Arundel Cnty.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2025
- Zukowski v. Anne Arundel Cnty.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2025