Allen v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
We recently held in Pixley v. United States, 692 A.2d 438 (D.C.1997), that the defendant’s convictions for carjacking 1 and robbery 2 did not merge. For similar reasons, we now conclude that John K. Allen’s conviction for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle (UUV) 3 did not merge with or into his carjacking conviction.
I
Allen was convicted by a jury of carjacking, robbery, and UUV. He was sentenced to consecutive terms of imprisonment for carjacking and robbery and a concurrent term for UUV. On appeal, he contends that his convictions for robbery and UUV both merge into…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- United States v. HunterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Pixley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Gilliam, Darron G.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Sutton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Malloy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- James A. Corbin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.