Legal Opinion

Allen v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1997No. 96-CF-431PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWELB, Associate Judge:

We recently held in Pixley v. United States, 692 A.2d 438 (D.C.1997), that the defendant’s convictions for carjacking 1 and robbery 2 did not merge. For similar reasons, we now conclude that John K. Allen’s conviction for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle (UUV) 3 did not merge with or into his carjacking conviction.

I

Allen was convicted by a jury of carjacking, robbery, and UUV. He was sentenced to consecutive terms of imprisonment for carjacking and robbery and a concurrent term for UUV. On appeal, he contends that his convictions for robbery and UUV both merge into…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. United States v. HunterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Pixley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Gilliam, Darron G.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Sutton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Malloy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. James A. Corbin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API