Legal Opinion

Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1987No. B14-86-413CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURPHY, Justice.

In consolidated actions appellees sued for actual and exemplary damages for their injuries sustained in a three-car accident involving a Yellow Cab driven by appellant Marvin Hughes. Appellants Greater Houston Transportation Company, Houston Cab Company, and Yellow Cab Company (the cab companies) attempted to avoid vicarious liability for Hughes’s actions on the theory that he was not an authorized or permiissive user of the Yellow Cab. Before trial, the court entered a default judgment on liability against Hughes as a sanction for failing to appear for depositions.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Morgan v. Compugraphic Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Jackson v. Van WinkleTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Eagle Trucking Co. v. Texas Bitulithic Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Thompson v. RobbinsTexas Supreme Court · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Torres v. Caterpillar, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  2. Kalamazoo Oil Co. v. BoermanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. FullertonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  4. McDaniel v. Camp (In Re Camp)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. Rogers v. J B Hunt Transport, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API