Legal Opinion
Benvenuto v. Taubman
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 13, 1988No. CV 88-0788PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEXLER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action as trustees of an employee benefit welfare plan (the “Plan”) to recover for alleged violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). Recovery is sought from Philip Taubman (“Taubman”) an individual partner in the now-defunct law firm of Schneider & Taubman (the “Firm”) for acts committed by the Firm and its partners in connection with a pre-paid legal services program purchased by former trustees of the Plan with the Plan’s assets (the “Fund”). The services contracted for were allegedly for the benefit…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor v. William J. NellisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Pedersen v. Manitowoc Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Northwestern National Bank v. Fox & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Whitfield v. TomassoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- Cone Mills Corporation v. HurdleDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- The Radiology Center, S.C. And Enrique Schwarz, M.D. v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Company and Robert F. ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Mason Tenders District Council Pension Fund v. MesseraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. KaufmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- L.I. Head Start Child Development Services, Inc. v. Economic Opportunity Commission of Nassau County, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Wall Street Transcript Corp. v. Ziff Communications Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.