Legal Opinion
In re Uber Techs., Inc., Data Sec. Breach Litig.
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided April 4, 2018No. MDL No. 2826PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SARAH S. VANCE, Chair
Before the Panel :* Plaintiffs in one action in the Northern District of California *1353move under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize this litigation in that district. This litigation currently consists of 10 actions pending in five districts,1 as listed on Schedule A. Since the filing of the motion, the Panel has been notified of seven related federal actions.2 The actions arise out of the announcement by Uber Technologies, Inc., on November 21, 2017, that certain personal information of 57 million Uber drivers and riders was inappropriately downloaded by individuals outside the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Kauffman Mutual Fund ActionsUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972
- In re Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
- In re Fluoroquinolone Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015
- In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Salespractices & Products Liability Litigation (No. II)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014
- In re Sonic Corp. Customer Data Security Breach LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Allura Fiber Cement Siding Prods. Liab. Litig.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2019
- Hart v. T-Mobile U.S. Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Hart v. T-Mobile U.S. Inc. Do not file in this case - All filings should be made in 4:23-md-3073.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2023
- Rolandson v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020