Legal Opinion
In Re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided January 21, 1972No. 78PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
2Per curiam
In 1968 Joseph B. Kauffman filed an action in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against sixty-five (65) mutual funds, thirty-eight (38) investment advisers managing those funds, thirty-seven (37) directors affiliated with both the funds and the investment advisers, and the Investment Company Institute, the trade association representative for the mutual fund industry. The complaint consisted of three counts. Count 1 was brought for violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2, and alleged a conspiracy among the defendants…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Joseph B. KAUFFMAN Et Al. v. the DREYFUS FUND, INC., Et Al., Investors Diversified Services, Inc., Et Al., AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- In Re Multidistrict Civil Antitrust Actions Involving the Distribution of Scotch WhiskeyUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1969
4Cited by39 opinions
- In Re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions. Joseph B. KauffmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
- In re Xarelto (Rivaroxaban) Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014
- In re Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
- In Re Falstaff Brewing Corp. Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
- In re Fluoroquinolone Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.