Legal Opinion
In re Allura Fiber Cement Siding Prods. Liab. Litig.
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided April 2, 2019No. MDL No. 2886PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SARAH S. VANCE, Chair
Before the Panel : Plaintiff in one action in the Southern District of Ohio moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize this litigation in the Southern District of Ohio. This litigation currently consists of seven actions pending in seven districts, as listed on Schedule A. Since the filing of the motion, the Panel has been notified of two additional related federal actions.1
All responding plaintiffs support centralization in the Southern District of Ohio.2 Defendants Plycem USA LLC, Elementia USA, Inc., and Elementia S.A.B. de C.V. oppose centralization and,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Kauffman Mutual Fund ActionsUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972
- In re Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
- In re Anheuser-Busch Beer Labeling Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
- In re Uber Techs., Inc., Data Sec. Breach Litig.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2018
3Cited by1 opinion
- Blackmore v. Smitty's Supply, IncDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2020