Legal Opinion

McKinley v. Willow Const. Co., Inc.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1984No. 82CA1345PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BABCOCK, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Houge W. McKinley and H.K. Hill, commenced this action for breach of contract and negligence against defendant, Willow Construction Company, Inc. (Willow), seeking damages resulting from defects in a roof constructed by Willow during remodeling of plaintiffs’ property. Willow filed a third party complaint against the truss manufacturer, Allied Trades, Inc., d/b/a the Barnett Company (Barnett), seeking indemnity and contribution, alleging that plaintiffs’ damages were caused by Barnett’s negligence in engineering the ■trusses incorporated into the roof.

Following…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Page v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  2. City of Aurora, Colorado, and the City of Colorado Springs, Colorado v. Bechtel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  3. Public Service Co. of Colorado v. District Court in & for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. Tamblyn v. Mickey & Fox, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  5. Western Insurance Co. v. BrochnerColorado Court of Appeals · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Bauman v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Central National Bank of Poteau v. McDanielCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
  5. Dunn v. PraissNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API