Legal Opinion

Tamblyn v. Mickey & Fox, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 8, 1978No. C-1291PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carrigan

Petitioners, the Tamblyns, brought this action for damages alleging that the respondents had negligently performed certain engineering work related to the construction of the Tamblyns’ home. The trial court granted the respondents’ motions for summary judgment, holding that the action had not been brought within two years after the claim for relief arose, and was therefore barred by section 13-80-127, C.R.S. 1973. The court of ap peals affirmed. Tamblyn v. Mickey and Fox, Inc., 39 Colo. App. 319, 568, P.2d 491 (1977). We granted certiorari, and now reverse the court of appeals and remand the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Duncan v. Schuster-Graham Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  2. Kittson County v. Wells, Denbrook & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cosmopolitan Homes, Inc. v. WellerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. City of Aurora, Colorado, and the City of Colorado Springs, Colorado v. Bechtel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  3. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  4. Cudahy Co. v. Ragnar Benson, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1981
  5. Mohawk Green Apartments v. KramerColorado Court of Appeals · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API