Legal Opinion

N. M. Long & Co. v. Cannon-Papanikolas Construction Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1959No. 8999PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

.CROCKETT, Chief Justice.

The plaintiffs sued for damages and for injunctive relief based upon the claim that the defendants in draining and conditioning their land had drained water from the adjoining lands of the plaintiffs. From adverse judgment the plaintiffs appeal.

The attack upon the judgment poses these questions: (1) Does the evidence compel a finding that the draining of the defendants’ land caused loss of water from the land of the plaintiffs; and (2) if so, can the' defendants be held liable for damages caused thereby.

The properties of the parties here involved are located near…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wrathall v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Justesen v. OlsenUtah Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bingham v. Roosevelt City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Finley v. Teeter Stone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Stubbs v. ErcanbrackUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Bayer v. NELLO L. TEER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. McGowan v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API