People v. Palmer
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.
The defendant and Robert Arter were jointly charged with the crime of grand theft. They were tried before a jury and a verdict against both defendants was' returned, but the trial court, on motion, granted this defendant a new trial. From this order the state has appealed on a typewritten transcript.
We take the facts of the case substantially as stated in appellant’s brief, as they are not controverted by respondent. These facts stand' in the record undisputed inasmuch as neither the defendant nor his associate took the stand at the trial and no evidence was offered on behalf of either of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. KauffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. CanfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- People v. TomskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- People v. WheatonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- People v. CavalaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. MegladderyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954