Legal Opinion
(PS) King v. CA Dept. of Water Resources
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 4, 2020No. 2:17-cv-01257Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ELISE KING, No. 2:17-cv-1257-MCE-EFB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 The court previously granted plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis, but 18 dismissed her original complaint with leave to amend pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).1 19 Plaintiff subsequently filed a first amended complaint (ECF No. 11), as well as a motion for 20 appointment of counsel (ECF No. 12). For the following reasons, plaintiff’s motion for 21…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.