Legal Opinion

Jones v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 2, 2001No. 00-067PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAmestoy, C.J.

Defehdant Richard Murphy appeals a parentage order finding him to be the biological father of Eric Jones, the youngest son of plaintiff Julie Jones. Defendant asserts that the Orange Family Court was without jurisdiction to consider plaintiffs parentage complaint against him because: (1) a final divorce judgment between plaintiff and her ex-husband Jeffrey Jones had determined that Mr. Jones had parental rights and responsibilities for Eric; (2) a subsequent “amended” divorce order, in which plaintiff and Mr. Jones ac*87knowledged that he was not Eric’s biological father, was without effect…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matter of Paternity of JRWWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hackley v. HackleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Godin v. GodinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  4. Richard B. v. Sandra B. B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Nancy Darlene M. v. James Lee M.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Columbia v. LawtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  2. O'Connell-Starkey v. StarkeySupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  3. Jones v. MurphySupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  4. O'CONNELL v. CorcoranNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. O'CONNELL v. CorcoranNew York Court of Appeals · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API