Legal Opinion
Radford v. Peerless Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 23, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Anthony F. Shaheen, J.), entered June 6, 2011. The order granted the motion of defendant Ladd’s Agency, Inc. for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against it.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: In this action seeking damages for, inter alia, breach of contract, plaintiff contends that Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of defendant Ladd’s Agency, Inc. (Ladd) for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against it. We reject that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Kimmell v. SchaeferNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Murphy v. KuhnNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Greenberg, Trager & Herbst, LLP v. HSBC Bank USANew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Hoffend & Sons, Inc. v. Rose & Kiernan, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- 5 AWNINGS PLUS, INC. v. MOSES INSURANCE GROUP, INC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- 5 Awnings Plus, Inc. v. Moses Insurance Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- 5 Awnings Plus, Inc. v. Moses Insurance Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013