Legal Opinion

Kimmell v. Schaefer

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1996PublishedCited by 318 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Smith, J.

The primary issue on this appeal is whether the relationship between the parties was sufficient to render defendant liable to plaintiffs for the tort of negligent misrepresentation. We affirm the order of the Appellate Division because the record supports the finding that a special relationship existed between the parties which under the circumstances here required defendant to speak with care.

Plaintiffs invested $320,000 each in a limited partnership called Cogenic Embarcadero L/P. This partnership involved one of several projects developed by Cogenic Energy…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. White v. GuarenteNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Eiseman v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Ossining Union Free School District v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by318 opinions

  1. Eternity Global Master Fund Limited v. Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York and Jpmorgan Chase BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  2. Mandarin Trading Ltd. v. WildensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Dallas Aerospace, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Cis Air Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. Crawford v. Franklin Credit Management Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  5. Suez Equity Investors, L.P. v. Toronto-Dominion BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

313 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API