Legal Opinion
Hoffend & Sons, Inc. v. Rose & Kiernan, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 8, 2006PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*155OPINION OF THE COURT
Rosenblatt, J.
The appeal before us involves a suit by a policyholder against its insurance broker, contending that the broker did not obtain a policy that would have covered the loss involved. We hold that, as a matter of law, the policyholder did not establish that it made a specific request for the coverage in question or that it had a special relationship with the broker. Accordingly, we affirm the Appellate Division’s dismissal of the complaint, although for different reasons.
Plaintiff Hoffend & Sons, Inc. is an Ontario County firm that does design and construction…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Murphy v. KuhnNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
3Cited by50 opinions
- Voss v. Netherlands InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- American Building Supply Corp. v. Petrocelli Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Abdel-Karim v. EgyptAir AirlinesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Cosmos, Queens Ltd. v. Matthias Saechang Im AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Joseph v. Interboro Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.