Legal Opinion
David v. City of Pittsburgh Zoning Board of Adjustment
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 5, 1994PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Judge.
David and Diane Blancett-Maddock (objectors) appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (trial court) which affirmed the decision of the Pittsburgh Zoning Board of Adjustment (Board) granting a special exception for the use of a portion of the subject property as a laundromat. We affirm.
The facts as recited by the trial court are restated as follows. The subject property is located at 1529 Brownsville Road in the City of Pittsburgh, in an R-4 Multiple Family Zoning District. A one-story nonconforming building is situated on the property. The building…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bray v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- East Manchester Township Zoning Hearing Board v. DallmeyerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Bilotta v. Haverford Township Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Searles v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Drucker v. ZHB, BORO. OF WLKNSBRGCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Appeal of ThompsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- 4154 Roosevelt Street, LLC v. Whitehall Township Zoning Hearing Bd., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County2010
- Northampton Township v. Reydler, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County2005
- Polish Hill Civic Assoc. v. City of Pittsburgh ZBA & Laurel CommunitiesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Take Back Your Neighborhood (RCO) v. 6600 Bustleton Associates City of Philadelphia Philadelphia Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.