Pitkin v. Harris
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Menominee. (Grant, J.) Assumpsit, Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
This suit was brought to recover on a note for $114.51 and interest, made by defendant to plaintiffs, and not disputed. But defendant claims it was paid' in this -wise, according to his statement, which, however, was substantially denied in many respects:
That defendant had been getting out wood, and upon being asked by Mr. Pinch, plaintiffs’ attorney, to secure it, offered to give him a mortgage on the wood, — enough to cover the amount.
“ The agreement was that I was to deliver the wood on the bank, and he to dispose of the wood.- He was to sell the wood, and give me credit for it. That was…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Luckehe v. First Nat. Bk. of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- State Bank v. ByrneMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Jersey Shore Trust Co. v. Owosso Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Wees v. PageWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Schafer v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912