Legal Opinion

State Bank v. Byrne

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1893PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Oakland. (Moore, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The faots are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

Plaintiff, a bank at Midland, in this State, on August 31,1891, sent to the Milford State Bank, at Milford, in this State, a demand draft upon the defendant, Patrick Byrne, drawn by tlie Midland Salt & Lumber Co., tlie title to which was in the plaintiff at the time of forwarding. Tlie defendant at that time, and for several years previous, had resided and been engaged in active business at Milford, and kept an account with tlie Milford State Bank. When drafts upon defendant were sent to the Milford State Bank for collection, Mr. Byrne, when he accepted the same, wrote his acceptance thereon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ward v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. British & American Mortgage Co. v. TibballsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  3. Pitkin v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Welge v. BattyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1882

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Luckehe v. First Nat. Bk. of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Bank of Montreal v. IngersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. Smith v. MillsOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Planters' Mercantile Co. v. Armour Packing Co. of Louisiana, Ltd.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Schafer v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API