Legal Opinion
Luckehe v. First Nat. Bk. of Marysville
California Supreme Court
Decided February 11, 1924No. Sac. No. 3445PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover from the defendant -the sum of $1,050, with interest, the amount evidenced by a certain certificate of deposit made and delivered by the defendant to the plaintiff. Judgment was entered for the defendant, and plaintiff has appealed.
On the eleventh day of December, 1920, appellant held an interest-bearing certificate of deposit for $1,050, issued to him by the First National Bank of Gridley. The certificate became due on that date, and appellant, desiring to transfer his account, indorsed the certificate over to the Gridley bank and received for the one…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- National Bank v. BurkhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Ward v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Bank of Antigo v. Union Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Hurley v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Van De Kamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- First State Bank of Bristow v. O'BannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- National Bank of New Zealand, Ltd. v. FinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Andrews v. WaldoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.