Elizabeth Roumbos v. Samuel G. Vazanellis and Thiros and Stracci, PC
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Najam, Judge.
Statement of the Case
Elizabeth Roumbos appeals the trial court’s entry of summary judgment for Samuel G. Vazanellis and Thiros and Stracci, PC (collectively, “the law firm”). Roumbos raises two issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as whether the trial court erred when it entered summary judgment. We hold that, al though the designated evidence shows that Roumbos, as a business invitee, was aware of a dangerous condition on the floor of the business, a genuine question of material fact exists with respect to whether the business owner should have anticipated…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Antonio Hughley v. State of Indiana, The Consolidated City of Indianapolis/Marion County, and The Indianapolis Metropolitan Police DepartmentIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Williams v. TharpIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- McSwane v. Bloomington Hospital & Healthcare SystemIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Smith v. BaxterIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Stacy Knighten v. East Chicago Housing Authority, Individually and d/b/a West Calumet Complex, Davis Security Service, LLC, and Donnell CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Elizabeth Roumbos v. Samuel G. Vazanellis & Thiros and Stracci, PCIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
- Elizabeth Roumbos v. Samuel G. Vazanellis and Thiros and Stracci, PCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017