Legal Opinion

Elizabeth Roumbos v. Samuel G. Vazanellis and Thiros and Stracci, PC

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 2017No. Court of Appeals Case 45A03-1606-CT-1424PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

Najam, Judge.Samuel Vazanellis and law firm Thi-ros and Straeci, PC, (collectively, “Law Firm”), request rehearing, asking us to reconsider our reversal of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in their favor. Law Firm specifically takes issue with our rejection of their argument that Roumbos’ testimony was equivocal. We stated in our original opinion:

In its brief on appeal, the law firm asserts that Roumbos was equivocal about the cause of her fall in her deposition testimony. We cannot agree. It is clear from the totality of her testimony that at all times Roumbos…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Perma Research and Development Company v. The Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  2. Gaboury v. Ireland Road Grace Brethren, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Elizabeth Roumbos v. Samuel G. Vazanellis and Thiros and Stracci, PCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Central Indiana Podiatry, P.C., Northwest Surgery Center, LLC, d/b/a Foot & Ankle Surgery Center, f/k/a Foot & Ankle Surgery Center, LLC and Anthony E. Miller, D.P.M. v. Barnes & Thornburg, LLPIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Elizabeth Roumbos v. Samuel G. Vazanellis & Thiros and Stracci, PCIndiana Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API