Legal Opinion

Bohnefeld v. Haney

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 10, 1996No. 86390PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GOODMAN, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from portions of the trial court’s journal entry of judgment filed September 21, 1995, entered on a jury verdict in favor of appellant Betty Bohnefeld (Bohne-feld) against appellee Catherine Haney (Haney). Based upon our review of the record and applicable law, we affirm in part, and reverse and remand in part.

Facts

Bohnefeld and Haney were involved in an automobile accident on May 16, 1991. Boh-nefeld sued Haney on April 13,1993, alleging negligence. Haney denied being negligent, and asserted Bohnefeld was herself contribu-torily…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Messler v. Simmons Gun Specialties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Fleet v. Sanguine, Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Fleming v. Baptist General ConventionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Walker v. St. Louissan Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. Holland v. Dolese Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lawson v. National Steel Erectors Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
  2. Allen Farms, Inc. v. Broce Const. Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
  3. Morava v. Central Oklahoma Medical Group, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. L. Environmental Service, Inc. v. United Motors, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API