Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Billado v. Control Commissioners

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 8, 1946PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, J.

By this petition for a writ of mandamus the plaintiffs seek to compel the defendants to give them a hearing upon their application for a first class license to sell malt and vinous beverages for consumption on the premises operated by them as a restaurant in the town of South Burlington. The petition shows that the plaintiffs at the time of making their application, and at several times thereafter, requested an opportunity to be heard thereon, and that the application was denied without giving them an opportunity to be heard. An answer was filed, which admits the allegations of the petition,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Ex parte ChristensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Town of Manchester v. Town of TownshendSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  4. Johnson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  5. State Ex Rel. Renner v. NoelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Whitesides v. Council of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Ackerman v. KogutSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951
  3. Yarbrough v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Van Ripper v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. In re Club 107Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API