Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brown v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 2, 2014No. S13G1612Published

1DissentHunstein, Justice

I firmly believe that the grand jury’s duty to protect individuals against unfounded criminal prosecutions requires grand jurors to be unbiased and impartial, particularly where as in this case, grand jurors are victims of the alleged crimes of which the accused has been charged. I believe that the accused may assert his right and challenge grand juror bias by filing a pretrial motion. Because Brown filed timely pretrial motions and demonstrated grand juror bias in this case, I must respectfully dissent.

1. An Unbiased and Impartial Grand Jury

“An indictment returned by a legally constituted…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Lawn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Beck v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API