Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE,1 Judge.
Before the Court are the cross appeals of Thomas Randall (Claimant) and Bethlehem Steel Corporation (Employer) from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed a referee’s decision denying Claimant’s petition for reinstatement of compensation benefits, but ordering reimbursement for medical and travel expenses.
*215Claimant suffered an injury to Ms back on December 15, 1983. He received compensation benefits until September 27, 1985, when a referee’s order was entered wMch granted Employer’s petition for termination of benefits, effective October 12, 1984.
Therea…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Fuhrman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Consolidated Freightways v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Canestrale v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shipley Oil Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995