Legal Opinion

Brokaw v. Kunze

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1923No. 18118PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, J.

The respondent, the Bank of Stan-wood, brought this action to foreclose certain bonds, claimed to be held by it as collateral for a loan to George W. Kunze, president of the Wisconsin Timber Company.

The testimony shows that, on October 1, 1921, George W. Kunze borrowed $16,000 from respondent and deposited as collateral security therefor thirty-four bonds of the timber company of the par value of $17,000. These bonds were the separate property of appellant Anna L. Kunze, the wife of George W. Kunze, deceased, were payable to bearer and transferable on delivery,

The trial court found that “the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murray v. LardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. Varney v. CurtisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Scandinavian American Bank v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. McNamara v. JoseWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Fisk Rubber Co. v. PinkeyWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Drouineau v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API