Legal Opinion

State v. Morrill

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 27, 2004No. 2003-654PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.

The defendant, Donald Morrill a/k/a Sam W. Morrill, appeals his conviction of aggravated felonious sexual assault, see RSA 632-A:2, III (1996), arguing that the Superior Court (Mohl, J.) erred by ruling that the defendant opened the door to otherwise inadmissible testimonial evidence and, thereby, violated his State and Federal Constitutional rights to a fair and impartial jury trial. We reverse and remand.

The defendant was convicted of aggravated felonious sexual assault against his stepdaughter, N.N. During a visit with her biological father in 1998, N.N. alleged that the defendant had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  2. Madeja v. MPB Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  3. State v. CrosmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  4. State v. MacRaeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  5. State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AinsworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  2. State v. MorrillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  3. State v. RoganSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API