Legal Opinion

State v. Crosman

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 4, 1984No. 83-229PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.

The defendant was convicted of robbery under RSA 636:1, 111(b). The Superior Court {Dunn, J.) overruled his objection to certain testimony and denied his motion to dismiss for insufficiency of the evidence. The court likewise denied his motion to set aside the subsequent verdict of guilty. We affirm.

Witnesses reported a robbery of the Brooks Discount Pharmacy in Dover at about 8:00 p.m. on April 1, 1982. They described the robber as about five feet six to five feet ten inches tall, wearing a blue windbreaker, gray sweatpants, and a ski mask, and carrying a metallic object that appeared to be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. LaBrancheSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. State v. MeloonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. BenoitSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. State v. EllisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  3. State v. DixonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  4. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  5. State v. JudkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API