Legal Opinion
Madeja v. MPB Corp.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 23, 2003No. 2002-197PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The defendant, MPB Corporation d/b/a Split Ballbearing, appeals a jury verdict in Superior Court (Morrill, J.) awarding the plaintiff, Michelle Madeja, compensatory and punitive damages for the sexual harassment and retaliation claims she brought under Title VII of *374the Civil Rights Act of 1964, see 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (2000) (Title VII), and RSA chapter 354-A.
On appeal, the defendant argues that the trial court erroneously: (1) instructed the jury regarding employer liability for co-worker sexual harassment; (2) instructed the jury regarding employer liability for coworker retaliation; (3)…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Simon v. San Paolo US Holding Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Dennis v. Osram Sylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Porter v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Carignan v. New Hampshire International Speedway, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Hubbard v. Tyco Integrated Cable Systems, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.