Legal Opinion
Haupt, Inc. v. Tarrant County Water Control & Improvement District Number One
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
Decided February 16, 1994No. 10-91-150-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REMAND
THOMAS, Chief Justice.
Inverse condemnation occurs whenever property is “taken” or “damaged” for public use without adequate compensation. Tex. Const, art. I, § 17. We originally held that the evidence conclusively established an inverse condemnation of the plaintiffs’ interests in the minerals under an eighty-acre tract when Tarrant County Water Control and Improvement District Number One, the developer and operator of the Richland-Cham-bers Reservoir in Navarro County, partially inundated the surface of the property to create the lake. See Haupt v. Tarrant Cty. Water…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Hudson v. WakefieldTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Lofton v. Texas Brine Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Getty Oil Company v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- City of Waco v. Texland CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Texas Genco, LP v. Valence Operating Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
- Tarrant County Water Control & Improvement District Number One v. FullwoodTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Stephenson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Valence Operating Co. v. Texas Genco, LP, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
- TARRANT CTY. WATER CONT. & IMP. DIST. NO 1 v. FullwoodTexas Supreme Court · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.